40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
63.91%
Similar revenue growth to PR's 64.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-7.63%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
467.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PR's 135.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
324.06%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PR's 121.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.70%
G&A reduction while PR shows 16.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of PR's 2200.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.95%
Operating expenses reduction while PR shows 13.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.40%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 0.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.79%
Similar interest expense growth to PR's 11.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-17.65%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
70.04%
EBITDA growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
151.65%
EBITDA margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.90%
Similar operating income growth to PR's 65.66%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
77.36%
Similar operating margin growth to PR's 79.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-80.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
61.85%
Pre-tax income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.72%
Pre-tax margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-113.27%
Tax expense reduction while PR shows 1264.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
65.30%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
78.83%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.32%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.32%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.