40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while PR shows 20.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.92%
Cost growth above 1.5x PR's 5.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-33.60%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 42.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-27.87%
Margin decline while PR shows 17.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth 50-75% of PR's 12.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 1942.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
14.90%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 19.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.91%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PR's 8.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
13.79%
Interest expense growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.96%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 15.12%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-60.49%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 36.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-162.05%
Operating income decline while PR shows 97.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-167.41%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 63.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-254.14%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 27.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-267.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 40.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
160.23%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PR's 33.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-166.34%
Net income decline while PR shows 27.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-172.07%
Net margin decline while PR shows 40.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-166.39%
EPS decline while PR shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.10%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.23%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.