40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.01%
Revenue decline while PR shows 16.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.13%
Cost reduction while PR shows 31.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.20%
Gross profit decline while PR shows 9.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.95%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.78%
G&A growth less than half of PR's 336.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
352.54%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 20.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
13.26%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PR's 87.75%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.98%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 46.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.79%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 101.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.24%
D&A growth less than half of PR's 33.35%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.28%
EBITDA decline while PR shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.18%
EBITDA margin decline while PR shows 16.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.43%
Operating income decline while PR shows 7.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.32%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 415.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.41%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 60.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 38.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.38%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.60%
Net income decline while PR shows 79.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.00%
Net margin decline while PR shows 53.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
EPS decline while PR shows 78.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.13%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 78.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.83%
Share count reduction while PR shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.69%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.