PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.50%
Revenue decline while PR shows 38.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-37.36%
Cost reduction while PR shows 52.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.09%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PR's 31.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.43%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
G&A reduction while PR shows 74.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.20%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PR's 33.79%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
47.70%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 53.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-5.97%
Total costs reduction while PR shows 53.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.10%
Interest expense reduction while PR shows 36.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.73%
D&A reduction while PR shows 66.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.22%
Operating income decline while PR shows 52.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.33%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 10.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
45.45%
Other expenses growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-355.68%
Tax expense reduction while PR shows 31.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.56%
Net income growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.37%
Net margin growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.68%
EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.47%
Diluted EPS growth while PR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.98%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.72%
Diluted share reduction while PR shows 2.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.