40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Revenue decline while PR shows 1.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
3.31%
Cost growth less than half of PR's 15.18%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-5.14%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.06%
G&A growth 50-75% of PR's 48.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.28%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of PR's 21.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.37%
Total costs growth less than half of PR's 16.59%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.68%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PR's 0.13%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
14.63%
Similar D&A growth to PR's 14.61%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-10.73%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-28.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-31.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-30.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.16%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.98%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.09%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PR's 6.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
1.25%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PR's 4.78%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.