40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.64%
Positive growth while PR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.30%
Cost increase while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.14%
Positive growth while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.15%
Margin expansion while PR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.19%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.52%
Similar other expenses growth to PR's 29.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
20.84%
Similar operating expenses growth to PR's 19.55%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
12.81%
Total costs growth while PR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.49%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.68%
D&A growth while PR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.58%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.62%
EBITDA margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4550.00%
Operating income decline while PR shows 18.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4196.17%
Operating margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.97%
Other expenses reduction while PR shows 87.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-91.09%
Pre-tax income decline while PR shows 54.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.90%
Pre-tax margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.07%
Tax expense growth while PR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-165.00%
Net income decline while PR shows 52.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-143.93%
Net margin decline while PR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.22%
EPS decline while PR shows 64.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-177.27%
Diluted EPS decline while PR shows 65.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.59%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.04%
Diluted share increase while PR reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.