40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.26%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 40.34%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
13.93%
Cost growth 50-75% of RRC's 23.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
7.26%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 46.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.72%
Margin decline while RRC shows 4.49% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.21%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
34.06%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 13.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.21%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 17.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.89%
D&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-8.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.89%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 117.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.56%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 109.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.93%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 49.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
239.88%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
22.31%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.93%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.55%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 4.68% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.