40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.24%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.67%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 8.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
31.24%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 6.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
37.04%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
710.60%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
345.38%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.07%
Total costs growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.22%
D&A growth while RRC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.56%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 18.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.60%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 19.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-45.79%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 48.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.39%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 38.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-961.59%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-110.35%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 52.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-110.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 42.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.75%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 54.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.74%
Net income decline while RRC shows 51.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.82%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 41.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.90%
EPS decline while RRC shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-101.81%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 3.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-5.89%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 3.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.