40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.58%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
137.65%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-40.04%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.36%
Margin decline while RRC shows 6.34% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.01%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 31.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-44.55%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 10.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.85%
Total costs growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.17%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 6.48%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-27.46%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.15%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 0.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
196.17%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x RRC's 10.39%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-28.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
46.26%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.65%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.37%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.94%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.13%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 1.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-16.23%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.