40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 27.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-5.52%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 12.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
38.86%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 30.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
24.88%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x RRC's 2.69%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 5.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RRC's 24.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.32%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 20.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.52%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 0.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
38.11%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.98%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 28.56%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
90.15%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 36.98%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
71.00%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x RRC's 7.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1749.84%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 38.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1085.14%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.13%
Share count increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.61%
Diluted share increase while RRC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.