40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.16%
Revenue growth below 50% of RRC's 12.86%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
17.38%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-17.99%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.50%
Margin decline while RRC shows 6.55% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.83%
G&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 5.03%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.78%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 24.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 20.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.20%
Similar total costs growth to RRC's 12.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-10.40%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 3.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.22%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 4.21%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.74%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 11.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.70%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-86.60%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 27.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 36.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-78.05%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 32.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.54%
Net income decline while RRC shows 25.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-89.86%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 33.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
EPS decline while RRC shows 26.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.63%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 26.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.03%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 0.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.