40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-40.99%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 5.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.14%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 75.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-58.48%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.11%
G&A growth less than half of RRC's 250.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.92%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
30.54%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.98%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.38%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 7.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.99%
D&A growth less than half of RRC's 455.97%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-68.61%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.41%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 326.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-125.13%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 26.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.58%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 20.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
202.50%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-119.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-144.28%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-106.93%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.07%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.25%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while RRC shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.