PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-34.02%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 4.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.43%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 13.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-49.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
383.87%
G&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 86.02%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while RRC shows 346.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-99.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.81%
Operating expenses growth less than half of RRC's 59.53%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.16%
Total costs growth less than half of RRC's 23.87%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.48%
Interest expense growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.24%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-70.93%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-134.64%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-152.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
65.10%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-136.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
125.44%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-438.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-716.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-446.30%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-442.59%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.79%
Share count reduction while RRC shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.