40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.23%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 1.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
10.83%
Cost increase while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-2.71%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.83%
Margin decline while RRC shows 4.32% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.70%
G&A growth 50-75% of RRC's 33.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-233.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
17.32%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 13.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
14.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 1.39%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.80%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 1.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.51%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 161.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.59%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 2.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.19%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 0.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-574.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-279.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-275.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
104.08%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-233.51%
Net income decline while RRC shows 46.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.60%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 44.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.00%
EPS decline while RRC shows 41.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-236.00%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 41.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.