40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.36%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-13.75%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
7.74%
Positive growth while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.22%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.69%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-110.99%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.76%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 14.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.57%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 6.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
89.47%
Interest expense growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.25%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 16.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.43%
EBITDA growth below 50% of RRC's 146.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.86%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.56%
Operating income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-117.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-90.64%
Pre-tax income decline while RRC shows 87.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while RRC shows 95.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.71%
Tax expense reduction while RRC shows 77.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.95%
Net income decline while RRC shows 94.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.85%
Net margin decline while RRC shows 101.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.64%
EPS decline while RRC shows 96.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.64%
Diluted EPS decline while RRC shows 98.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.