40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-33.55%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-17.66%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.52%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 17.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 29.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.47%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.52%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 5.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
122.40%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x RRC's 10.90%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-15.45%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-30.78%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.16%
EBITDA margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1010.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1469.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.24%
Other expenses change of 15.24% while RRC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.99%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.95%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.68%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.01%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.01%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
11.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.