40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
58.07%
Positive growth while RRC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.02%
Cost reduction while RRC shows 3.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
163.75%
Positive growth while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
66.85%
Margin expansion while RRC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of RRC's 500.18%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-3.81%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.52%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-62.23%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.66%
D&A reduction while RRC shows 332.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-69.39%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 1678.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.64%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 913.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
206.96%
Operating income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
167.67%
Operating margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.68%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.14%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
54.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.57%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.23%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.43%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.20%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.41%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.05%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.