40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.42%
Revenue decline while RRC shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.38%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-28.98%
Gross profit decline while RRC shows 45.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.62%
Margin decline while RRC shows 46.27% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-933.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.98%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.95%
Interest expense growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.59%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-217.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.88%
Operating income decline while RRC shows 25.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.40%
Operating margin decline while RRC shows 26.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
45.17%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.64%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.66%
Tax expense growth while RRC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.49%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.99%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.61%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.48%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.