40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.50%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
5.68%
Similar cost growth to RRC's 5.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-25.93%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.81%
G&A reduction while RRC shows 8.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Other expenses reduction while RRC shows 9.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.53%
Operating expenses reduction while RRC shows 17.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.75%
Total costs reduction while RRC shows 6.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.23%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 1.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x RRC's 1.79%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-23.73%
EBITDA decline while RRC shows 11.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.41%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
110.91%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.65%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-233.33%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-23.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.73%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.73%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.