40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.29%
Revenue growth 50-75% of RRC's 33.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
25.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x RRC's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.01%
Gross profit growth below 50% of RRC's 196.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.39%
Margin decline while RRC shows 122.76% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
G&A growth while RRC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
157.14%
Other expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
128.13%
Operating expenses growth while RRC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x RRC's 2.84%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-5.43%
Interest expense reduction while RRC shows 17.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.70%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
465.75%
EBITDA growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.15%
EBITDA margin decline while RRC shows 64.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
132.99%
Operating income growth below 50% of RRC's 599.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
127.43%
Operating margin growth below 50% of RRC's 425.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
120.72%
Pre-tax income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-528.57%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
150.33%
Net income growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
141.84%
Net margin growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
150.21%
EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
149.15%
Diluted EPS growth while RRC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x RRC's 0.83%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of RRC's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.