40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of SD's 24.76%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-5.52%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
38.86%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of SD's 66.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
24.88%
Margin expansion 50-75% of SD's 33.67%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Other expenses growth less than half of SD's 200.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of SD's 222.41%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.32%
Total costs reduction while SD shows 98.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.52%
D&A reduction while SD shows 9.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
38.11%
EBITDA growth while SD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.98%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SD's 6.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
90.15%
Operating income growth while SD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.00%
Operating margin growth while SD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1749.84%
Other expenses reduction while SD shows 8.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1085.14%
Tax expense growth while SD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.13%
Share count change of 3.13% while SD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
3.61%
Diluted share change of 3.61% while SD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.