40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-48.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
5.86%
Cost growth above 1.5x SD's 1.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-69.85%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-41.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
G&A growth while SD reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
114.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SD's 19.37%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.36%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SD's 3.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.16%
Interest expense growth less than half of SD's 17.23%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.33%
D&A growth above 1.5x SD's 3.74%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-90.23%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-116.77%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-132.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.86%
Other expenses growth while SD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-125.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-140.94%
Tax expense reduction while SD shows 15300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-123.79%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-145.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-118.55%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.12%
Share count increase while SD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.89%
Diluted share change of 27.89% while SD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.