PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.94%
Revenue decline while VET shows 6.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
14.92%
Similar cost growth to VET's 18.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-33.60%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.45%
G&A growth while VET reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
14.90%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VET's 1.55%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.91%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x VET's 10.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
13.79%
Interest expense growth while VET reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.96%
D&A growth less than half of VET's 37.76%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-60.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.34%
EBITDA margin decline while VET shows 9.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-162.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-167.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-254.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-267.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
160.23%
Tax expense growth while VET reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-166.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-172.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.39%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.10%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.23%
Share count reduction while VET shows 1.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.84%
Diluted share reduction while VET shows 2.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.