PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.65%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-22.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Margin decline while VET shows 3.88% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
341.67%
Marketing expense change of 341.67% while VET maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-7.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.05%
Operating expenses reduction while VET shows 26.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.12%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.14%
Interest expense growth less than half of VET's 14.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.28%
D&A growth while VET reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.29%
EBITDA growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.36%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.88%
Pre-tax income growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.24%
Pre-tax margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
Tax expense growth while VET reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.59%
Net income growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.86%
Net margin growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.40%
EPS growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth while VET declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.30%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.54%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.