40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.65%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-6.34%
Cost reduction while VTLE shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.33%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
341.67%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x VTLE's 24.06%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-7.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.05%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.12%
Total costs reduction while VTLE shows 3.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.14%
Interest expense growth while VTLE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.28%
D&A growth less than half of VTLE's 4.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.29%
EBITDA growth below 50% of VTLE's 134.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.36%
Other expenses reduction while VTLE shows 67.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of VTLE's 157.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of VTLE's 158.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of VTLE's 166.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.59%
Net income growth below 50% of VTLE's 155.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.86%
Net margin growth below 50% of VTLE's 156.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.40%
EPS growth below 50% of VTLE's 153.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of VTLE's 152.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.30%
Share count reduction while VTLE shows 2.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.54%
Diluted share reduction while VTLE shows 5.73% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
