40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
58.07%
Positive growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
-12.02%
Cost reduction while Energy median is -0.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
163.75%
Positive growth while Energy median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
66.85%
Margin change of 66.85% versus flat Energy margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
G&A reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
175.00%
Other expenses change of 175.00% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-3.81%
Operating expenses reduction while Energy median is -1.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.52%
Total costs reduction while Energy median is -2.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-62.23%
Interest expense reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-10.66%
D&A reduction while Energy median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-69.39%
EBITDA decline while Energy median is -3.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.64%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
206.96%
Operating income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
167.67%
Margin change of 167.67% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
6.68%
Other expenses growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
28.14%
Pre-tax income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
54.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
36.57%
Tax expense growth while Energy reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
23.23%
Net income growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
51.43%
Net margin growth while Energy declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
23.20%
EPS change of 23.20% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
23.41%
Diluted EPS change of 23.41% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Energy median of 0.00%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.