40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.50%
Revenue decline while Energy median is 1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
7.33%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.04%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-37.39%
Gross profit decline while Energy median is 3.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-21.25%
Margin decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.91%
G&A change of 23.91% versus flat Energy overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.26%
Other expenses reduction while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
20.68%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.62%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
13.52%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 2.91%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
27.85%
Interest expense change of 27.85% versus flat Energy costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
8.81%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.61%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
60.69%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.81%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-213.10%
EBITDA margin decline while Energy median is 1.74%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.25%
Operating income decline while Energy median is 4.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-101.57%
Operating margin decline while Energy median is 1.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8666.67%
Other expenses growth while Energy reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
59.63%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
100.79%
Margin change of 100.79% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
5800.00%
Tax expense growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 4.13%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
-11.18%
Net income decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
11.72%
Margin change of 11.72% versus flat Energy. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.76%
EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.76%
Diluted EPS decline while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
0.01%
Share count reduction below 50% of Energy median of 0.01%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of Energy median of 0.01%. Jim Chanos would check for issues.