40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.42
Similar to VET's ratio of 1.36. Walter Schloss would see both operating with a similar safety margin.
1.15
0.75–0.9x VET's 1.30. Bill Ackman would recommend finding ways to boost near-cash assets or reduce short-term liabilities.
0.17
Below 0.5x VET's 0.50. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11
Short-term coverage of 11.11 while VET has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.