40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
0.51
0.75–0.9x VET's 0.60. Bill Ackman might push for more working capital or better cash management.
0.51
Similar ratio to VET's 0.57. Walter Schloss might see both running close to industry norms.
0.00
Below 0.5x VET's 0.02. Michael Burry could foresee potential liquidity shocks if times get tough.
-6.42
Both companies show negative interest coverage. Martin Whitman would investigate if industry distress creates special situation opportunities.
1.39
Short-term coverage of 1.39 while VET has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.