PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.23
1.2–1.5 – Acceptable for many sectors. Peter Lynch might watch carefully for upcoming liabilities.
1.20
1.0–1.2 – On the edge. Philip Fisher might worry about unexpected shortfalls or partial reliance on inventory liquidation.
0.61
0.4–0.7 – Lower coverage. Philip Fisher would question if the firm can quickly raise extra cash if needed.
0.24
Below 2 – Weak. Howard Marks would fear that a downturn might jeopardize debt payments.
0.37
Below 1.0 – Risk of falling short. Howard Marks would suspect the firm might need external funding if OCF falters.