40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
13.75%
Similar ROE to CRK's 12.61%. Walter Schloss would examine if both firms share comparable business models.
4.02%
ROA 50-75% of CRK's 5.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize potential misallocation of assets.
5.26%
Positive ROCE while CRK is negative. John Neff would see if competitive strategy explains the difference.
72.43%
Gross margin above 1.5x CRK's 1.35%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
39.82%
Positive operating margin while CRK is negative. John Neff might see a significant competitive edge in operations.
36.79%
Net margin below 50% of CRK's 120.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or structural weaknesses.