40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.51%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 3.71%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.73%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 3.32%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.35%
Negative ROCE while EQT is at 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
71.76%
Gross margin 50-75% of EQT's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-4.43%
Negative operating margin while EQT has 29.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-10.00%
Negative net margin while EQT has 21.11%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.