40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-4.88%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.42%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 6.07%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.37%
ROCE below 50% of EQT's 9.06%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
60.44%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x EQT's 52.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
3.79%
Operating margin below 50% of EQT's 25.74%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-17.64%
Negative net margin while EQT has 17.30%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.