PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-2.32%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 3.83%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.00%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 3.22%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.92%
Negative ROCE while EQT is at 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
40.69%
Similar gross margin to EQT's 39.70%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-11.80%
Negative operating margin while EQT has 33.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-15.36%
Negative net margin while EQT has 22.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.