40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-16.00%
Negative ROE while EQT stands at 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-4.24%
Negative ROA while EQT stands at 2.25%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-4.91%
Negative ROCE while EQT is at 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
49.28%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x EQT's 37.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-38.68%
Negative operating margin while EQT has 31.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-40.18%
Negative net margin while EQT has 16.61%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.