40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.33%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 6.54%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.14%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 2.65%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
3.34%
ROCE 50-75% of VET's 6.59%. Martin Whitman would worry if management fails to deploy capital effectively.
48.50%
Gross margin 50-75% of VET's 83.04%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
25.19%
Operating margin below 50% of VET's 50.52%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-1.24%
Negative net margin while VET has 23.91%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.