40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.24%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.12%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.61%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.78%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
49.27%
Gross margin 75-90% of VET's 65.26%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
-17.05%
Negative operating margin while VET has 15.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-2.94%
Negative net margin while VET has 7.31%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.