40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-22.54%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 2.27%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-6.58%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 1.06%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.04%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
38.15%
Gross margin below 50% of VET's 77.13%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-17.17%
Negative operating margin while VET has 42.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-121.37%
Negative net margin while VET has 10.81%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.