40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-1.51%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 4.01%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.43%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 1.85%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
2.69%
ROCE 1.25-1.5x VET's 2.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm’s capital structure drives superior returns.
65.61%
Gross margin above 1.5x VET's 35.99%. David Dodd would assess whether superior technology or brand is driving this.
26.98%
Similar margin to VET's 26.18%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies share cost structures or economies of scale.
-4.98%
Negative net margin while VET has 23.59%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.