40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-4.88%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 5.91%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.42%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 2.74%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
0.37%
ROCE below 50% of VET's 3.91%. Michael Burry would question the viability of the firm’s strategy.
60.44%
Gross margin 75-90% of VET's 68.84%. Bill Ackman would ask if incremental improvements can close the gap.
3.79%
Operating margin below 50% of VET's 40.42%. Michael Burry would investigate whether this signals deeper issues.
-17.64%
Negative net margin while VET has 31.22%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.