40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
4.22%
Positive ROE while VET is negative. John Neff would see if this signals a clear edge over the competitor.
1.94%
Positive ROA while VET shows negative. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a clear operational edge.
-0.03%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
49.01%
Gross margin 1.25-1.5x VET's 44.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if this advantage is sustainable.
-0.46%
Negative operating margin while VET has 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
34.15%
Positive net margin while VET is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage vs. the competitor.