40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.06%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.03%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 0.03%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-0.15%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
43.32%
Similar gross margin to VET's 44.89%. Walter Schloss would check if both companies have comparable cost structures.
-1.79%
Negative operating margin while VET has 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-0.38%
Negative net margin while VET has 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.