40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.21%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 24.24%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.49%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 8.35%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.16%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
33.98%
Gross margin 50-75% of VET's 49.44%. Martin Whitman would worry about a persistent competitive disadvantage.
-7.15%
Negative operating margin while VET has 14.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-12.12%
Negative net margin while VET has 103.26%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.