40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-5.15%
Negative ROE while VET stands at 12.19%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-1.62%
Negative ROA while VET stands at 4.58%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-1.59%
Negative ROCE while VET is at 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for capital misallocation or cyclical downturn.
27.61%
Gross margin below 50% of VET's 70.48%. Michael Burry would watch for cost or pricing crises.
-8.85%
Negative operating margin while VET has 49.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand urgent improvements in cost or revenue.
-12.25%
Negative net margin while VET has 33.10%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.