40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-2.74
Negative P/E while EQT shows 14.47. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
18.12
P/S above 1.5x EQT's 9.46. Michael Burry would check for mean reversion risks.
1.34
Similar P/B to EQT's 1.68. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-49.96
Negative FCF while EQT shows P/FCF of 298.13. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
79.45
P/OCF less than half of EQT's 215.70. David Dodd would verify if operating efficiency justifies this discount.
1.34
Similar fair value ratio to EQT's 1.68. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
-9.11%
Negative earnings while EQT shows yield of 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-2.00%
Negative FCF while EQT shows yield of 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.