40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
7.58
P/E 50-75% of PR's 11.55. Mohnish Pabrai would examine if this pricing gap presents opportunity.
4.85
P/S of 4.85 while PR has no sales. Bruce Berkowitz would examine revenue quality advantage.
0.99
Similar P/B to PR's 1.01. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-141.70
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
11.27
P/OCF 1.1-1.25x PR's 9.21. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior operating efficiency.
0.99
Similar fair value ratio to PR's 1.01. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
3.30%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x PR's 2.16%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-0.71%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.