40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
26.13
P/E above 1.5x VET's 9.01. Jim Chanos would check for potential multiple compression risks.
6.90
P/S 50-75% of VET's 12.05. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if sales quality justifies the gap.
2.01
P/B less than half of VET's 4.13. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-65.49
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 69.73. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
23.14
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 31.36. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
2.01
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 4.13. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
0.96%
Earnings yield below 50% of VET's 2.78%. Michael Burry would check for earnings deterioration risks.
-1.53%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.