40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-11.08
Negative P/E while VET shows 13.62. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
15.23
Similar P/S to VET's 16.01. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.33
P/B 50-75% of VET's 2.56. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-67.81
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 349.99. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
25.06
Similar P/OCF to VET's 25.30. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.33
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 2.56. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
-2.26%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 1.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-1.47%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
