40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.18
P/E less than half of VET's 90.34. Charlie Munger would verify if competitive advantages justify such a discount.
9.18
P/S less than half of VET's 18.69. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
1.28
P/B 50-75% of VET's 2.46. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if asset composition explains the gap.
-244.60
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
16.80
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 30.21. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.28
Fair value ratio 50-75% of VET's 2.46. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if business quality explains the gap.
2.72%
Earnings yield exceeding 1.5x VET's 0.28%. David Dodd would verify if earnings quality justifies this premium.
-0.41%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
