40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
-127.63
Negative P/E while VET shows 65.18. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability versus competitor.
14.98
Similar P/S to VET's 19.05. David Dodd would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar business quality.
1.24
P/B less than half of VET's 3.17. David Dodd would verify if asset quality justifies this discount.
-128.39
Negative FCF while VET shows P/FCF of 211.08. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.
23.33
P/OCF 50-75% of VET's 32.42. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if working capital management explains the gap.
1.24
Fair value ratio less than half of VET's 3.17. David Dodd would verify if competitive position justifies this discount.
-0.20%
Negative earnings while VET shows yield of 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would examine path to profitability.
-0.78%
Negative FCF while VET shows yield of 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cash flow improvement potential.